Ava DuVernay - 13th

How We Are Tolerating Slavery In Today’s World: Ava DuVernay’s Lens

Start

The 2016 American documentary 13th by Ava DuVernay has received widespread critical acclaim and is still to this day one of the most relevant documentaries on Netflix. Throughout the documentary, director Ava DuVernay reflects on the history of racial inequality in the United States, highlighting that the prison system is flawed, with the majority of prisoners in the nation being disproportionately African Americans. 

The film first came out on Netflix, where you can still watch it, but was made available for free on YouTube by Netflix itself in April 2020, which is indicative of how relevant the documentary still is in today’s world. 

Ava DuVernay´s 13th: Essential Viewing


When you abolish one form of slavery, you often reinvent it in another, a scholar declares early in the 13th century. Ava DuVernay builds on this claim by showing how the 13th Amendment’s exception clause, written in 1865, laid the foundation for mass incarceration. Blending expert testimony with historical evidence, the film makes visible the ways imprisonment has served as a modern continuation of coerced labour.

Ava DuVernay, 13th, Slavery

Therefore, the documentary argues that slavery is still vastly present today in the form of imprisonment, which largely affects black people. This is a clear example of how the institutionalised racism we are still fighting against today actually has deeper roots in American history. It is worth mentioning that institutionalised racism is arguably not a uniquely American issue.

Although it may be prevalent and perhaps more evident in the US, as the political climate and protests have shown, the reality is that systemic racism is present to some level in many other countries’ institutions and laws as well. 

In fact, 13th resonated all over the world: in particular, the views of the film witnessed a surge in 2020 in the wake of the George Floyd protests, which themselves spread worldwide shortly after the events.

Ava DuVernay herself reflected on the distribution of the film, which occurred on Netflix, something that was then uncommon, rather than through theatrical release, which was industry standard before the pandemic. She explained that her priority was reaching the widest audience possible, saying that “if I’m telling these stories to reach a mass audience, then really, nothing else matters.”

Reception

The documentary received good reviews and was highly praised for its powerful narration of such important and relevant topics, receiving an Academy Award nomination for Best Documentary Feature. It received high scores on various websites, indicating the audience’s positive response, with 97% on Rotten Tomatoes and 8.2 on IMDb.

Similarly, the documentary was acclaimed by critics. The New York Times called the documentary “powerful, infuriating [and] electrifying” and underlined the thought-provoking aspect of 13th, which is described as a documentary that “will get your blood boiling.” 

However, the reviews were not unanimously positive. Kyle Smith for The New York Post wrote a negative review of the film, claiming that the documentary consists of misinformation and undermines the contributions of civil rights activists. If one looks closely at the thesis exposed in the documentary, 13th does not portray the struggles and achievements of civil rights activists as useless but rather wants to highlight how racism is institutional and structural. Therefore, it is constantly perpetrated despite the individual’s effort to overcome it.

Institutional racism

13th situates the biggest challenge in institutional racism, rather than personal actions and interaction, which is what we can call individual racism. Contrary to the latter, institutional or systemic racism operates on a deeper and more subtle level: it is a hidden process, present within important forces of power in our society, such as the process of criminalisation and the prison system, as underlined by Ava DuVernay in this documentary.

Its institutional trait makes racism harder to dismantle and identify: it involves admitting the system is, in fact, flawed. Our laws and institutions are not neutral forces untouched by politics, but can actively be seen as tools in the hands of whoever is in power. This condemns those who are not seen or recognised as true citizens to unfair and unequal treatment under the law. In the words of American sociologist W. E. B. Du Bois, “a system cannot fail those it was never meant to protect.” 

As Ava DuVernay suggests in her documentary, the system is ultimately flawed and, as such, it cannot be repaired from within but needs to be completely rebuilt. In other words, a just and equal system can only exist if we choose to invite a radical change rather than reform one that is already broken, to begin with. 

Relevance to today’s situation

In her documentary, Ava DuVernay also reflects on the depiction of dead bodies on screen and more broadly throughout the media. Towards the end of the documentary, the focus is shifted to discuss the power of showing such footage on-screen and the visual shock of seeing black people being killed, which forces the audience to pay attention to the issue. Not only that, but the presence and circulation of this footage can also be used to hold the perpetrators accountable and get justice.

This can be particularly important in today’s climate. We currently live in a world in which, thanks to the new technologies and how widespread they are, anyone can film police brutality and bring this issue to worldwide attention. This is what happened in 2020 with George Floyd’s murder, which arguably got attention and ultimately justice because of the footage being shown online in both social media and news outlets. 

As many have pointed out during the Black Lives Matter protests that followed George Floyd’s murder, police brutality is not something new, nor is it becoming more frequent. It is just getting filmed now and, thus, it is getting attention from the public. Although the spread of such footage may have its positive effects, such as the public outrage that we have witnessed in 2020, Ava DuVernay invites us to reflect on the emotional consequences of showing something so visually shocking. For the families of the victims.

Similarly, the documentary examines the implications that this brings in terms of the power that mass media holds in today’s society, a topic that the filmmaker had discussed in her previous feature film Selma, as well. 

In other words, 13th focuses on the fact that the black body is being used for profit and politics, as Ava DuVernay herself has stated. Throughout the documentary, the filmmaker illustrates her points and her argument very clearly using graphics as well as rap music to make the audience understand that slavery has not simply disappeared but has obtained a new look.

That is something that the documentary does not allow us to forget, something that we can’t forget. If 13th leaves you upset, and it should, it is because we are arguably nowhere closer to solving the problem of institutional racism than we were when the documentary was made. Despite the wave of protests and outrage that 2020 has seen spread worldwide.


Keep Independent Voices Alive!

Rock & Art – Cultural Outreach is more than a magazine; it’s a movement—a platform for intersectional culture and slow journalism, created by volunteers with passion and purpose.

But we need your help to continue sharing these untold stories. Your support keeps our indie media outlet alive and thriving.

Donate today and join us in shaping a more inclusive, thoughtful world of storytelling. Every contribution matters.”


Sarah Beth Andrews (Editor)

A firm believer in the power of independent media, Sarah Beth curates content that amplifies marginalised voices, challenges dominant narratives, and explores the ever-evolving intersections of art, politics, and identity. Whether she’s editing a deep-dive on feminist film, commissioning a piece on underground music movements, or shaping critical essays on social justice, her editorial vision is always driven by integrity, curiosity, and a commitment to meaningful discourse.

When she’s not refining stories, she’s likely attending art-house screenings, buried in an obscure philosophy book, or exploring independent bookshops in search of the next radical text.

Clotilde Chinnici (Author)

Clotilde's love for film began at a very young age with the Disney cartoons she would watch over and over. However, her passion for films truly sparked with Hunger Games and Harry Potter. After graduating with a BA in Film from King's College London, Clotilde started working in film production and entertainment journalism while developing a deeper understanding of film movements and trends. Although most of her time is occupied by watching films, writing and talking about them to anyone who will listen, Clotilde enjoys reading and baking in her free time.

guest

0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Categories

Don't Miss Out!

hijab punk in Denmark

Safety Pins and State Forms: Hijab Punk in Denmark’s Border Regime

Content warning: This article contains discussion of Islamophobia, racism and state discrimination. Late autumn in Copenhagen, the night bus breathes…
frankenstein | Rock & Art

Empathy and Monstrosity: Feminine Gaze, Theological Inversion, and the Ethics of Creation in Guillermo del Toro’s Frankenstein

Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein; or, The Modern Prometheus (1818) has long stood as a warning against humanity’s desire to play God.…