When Sara, an EU‑trained nurse in Birmingham, discovered that new immigration checks might curtail her right to nurse in the NHS, she felt the sharp edges of policy cutting into her livelihood and sense of belonging. Her story reflects a wider reality: how Brexit has affected women’s rights in the UK, reshaping not only legal guarantees but the very fabric of daily life for millions of women. As borders shifted on paper, women found themselves navigating uncertain terrain, where once‑secure workplaces, health services and social supports risked slipping beyond reach.
From the halls of Westminster to community centres in Glasgow and Cardiff, voices rose in protest. Campaigners at the Fawcett Society and researchers at the Women’s Budget Group began sounding alarms about the Brexit impact on women’s rights, highlighting disparities in pay, rising childcare costs and threats to maternity provisions. Their reports drew on the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, the Equality Act 2010 and a patchwork of EU directives now in limbo—legal bedrocks that had once underpinned protections against discrimination and workplace harassment.
Yet these changes have unfolded unevenly. Black and Asian women, low‑paid workers and migrant mothers have borne the brunt of policy shifts, while well‑resourced sectors have scrambled to maintain continuity. In exploring the Brexit consequences for women’s employment opportunities, we see patterns of exclusion emerge alongside stories of resilience: grassroots initiatives in London’s boroughs, union campaigns for equal pay and one‑off legal victories reminding us that rights must be defended, not assumed.
This article will trace four interconnected arenas of change: women’s employment and economic security; the re‑engineering of gender equality legislation; access to sexual and reproductive healthcare; and the frontline responses of women’s advocacy groups Brexit response.
Assessing Women’s Employment after Brexit and Economic Security
Brexit delivered a seismic shock to the UK labour market, and it is women who have often felt the sharpest aftershocks. With the end of free movement and the introduction of a points‑based immigration system, sectors long sustained by EU nationals—healthcare, hospitality and social care—have seen staffing shortages that intensify pressures on remaining staff.
“I’ve seen colleagues leave because they couldn’t secure the right visa, and that left the rest of us covering extra shifts,” said Pat Cullen, General Secretary of the Royal College of Nursing, capturing the strain felt on the shop floor. For many British women, increased workloads and fewer job openings have deepened a sense of precarity.
Sara’s experience highlights these challenges directly: as immigration checks tightened, she confronted both delays in her registration and growing understaffing on hospital wards, a vivid illustration of Brexit consequences for women’s employment opportunities.
Pay inequality has also emerged as a stubborn obstacle to economic security. Despite commitments to gender equality post‑Brexit in the UK, the gender pay gap widened in 2021 and 2022. Women remain overrepresented in lower‑paid roles, most vulnerable to supply‑chain disruptions and inflationary cost rises, entrenching Brexit and equal pay in the UK challenges and widening the gender pay gap.
Moreover, reports of post-Brexit gender discrimination in the UK have become more frequent. Migrant women—particularly from Eastern Europe—have faced uncertainty over residency status and right‑to‑work documentation, fuelling fears of exploitation and job loss. Employers navigating a patchwork of new guidance have sometimes erred, wrongly judging women ineligible or leaving them in limbo, heightening incidences of workplace discrimination and eroding trust in fair treatment.
Childcare and social care costs have surged as labour shortages drive up fees. Before Brexit, EU regulations on parental leave and carers’ rights provided a consistent baseline across member states; now, divergence in EU laws and women’s rights in the UK frameworks makes balancing paid work and family life ever more precarious, underscoring the deep links between women’s employment after Brexit and broader economic justice.
Legal Shifts: Changes to gender equality legislation post‑Brexit
Before Brexit, the UK’s equality framework drew heavily on EU law—among them the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, the Equal Treatment Directive and the Pregnant Workers Directive—which had been transposed into domestic statutes like the Equality Act 2010. These instruments offered courts clear benchmarks for interpreting discrimination claims and equal‑pay disputes, ensuring that British judges looked to Strasbourg and Luxembourg for guidance.
The European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 converted existing EU‑derived legislation into UK law, but froze any future rulings of the Court of Justice of the European Union from shaping domestic interpretation. For readers less versed in UK law, this means that while the text of EU rules survives, its evolving case law no longer applies, removing a dynamic layer of protection.
One notable casualty is the C‑32/93 Enderby v Frenchay Health Authority ruling, a landmark equal pay decision that guided UK tribunals in assessing comparators. Post‑Brexit, that clarity is lost, leaving employment tribunals to interpret similar issues without direct ECJ precedent—a potential setback for those pursuing Brexit and equal pay in the UK actions.
Campaigners have warned that these shifts risk creating gaps in protection. Professor Sandra Fredman of Oxford has cautioned that Brexit effects on gender policies may solidify legal ambiguities, particularly around maternity discrimination and flexible working entitlements, once underpinned by EU directives.
Another real‑world example emerged in a case about pregnancy loss at work, where claimants previously cited EU‑derived guidance to assert their rights. Without future ECJ oversight, such cases may struggle to find a consistent footing, illustrating how the role of EU directives in UK women’s rights before Brexit was more than symbolic—it was a living source of jurisprudence.
Looking ahead, the question of gender equality post‑Brexit in the UK hinges on domestic reform. Scotland intends to keep pace with EU norms, while England and Wales debate separate reviews of discrimination laws. Senior advocates—including Harriet Harman—have urged a fresh legislative instrument, a standalone Gender Progress Duty, to embed enforceable gender‑impact assessments in all new policy.
Access Denied? Impact of Brexit on women’s access to healthcare services in the UK
When Maria, a midwife from Madrid who trained under EU standards, arrived in Liverpool to continue her vocation, she encountered delays registering with the Nursing and Midwifery Council and uncertainty over professional qualifications—early ripples of the impact of Brexit on women’s access to healthcare services in the UK.
These bureaucratic hurdles have compounded staffing shortfalls in maternity units, where continuity of care is vital. Women in remote areas now face longer waits for antenatal appointments, a stark reminder that policy shifts reverberate through wards and waiting rooms alike.
The fracturing of reciprocal healthcare arrangements has dealt a particular blow to reproductive freedom. Before Brexit, women living near the Irish border could access services across jurisdictions under EU‑wide agreements. Today, cross‑border travel for terminations or fertility treatments demands additional funding and legal navigation.
“I had to drive over 400 miles because I couldn’t access a termination at home. It felt like my right was erased overnight,” recalled Emma Johnson, highlighting the human cost of changing arrangements.
Charities such as MSI Reproductive Choices and BPAS have reported increased enquiries from British women seeking clarity on entitlements, underscoring how Brexit and maternity rights in the UK remain precarious and unevenly applied. Contraceptive supply chains have also felt tremors, as import delays for crucial medications exacerbate strain on community clinics.
Mental health and domestic violence support services have struggled to fill the gap left by EU funding schemes for integrated care pathways. With those grants ended, local authorities scramble to maintain refuges and counselling provision. The Brexit and women’s health services in the UK landscape now resemble a patchwork quilt—some regions uphold comprehensive provision, while others unravel entirely.
Amidst these challenges, grassroots networks such as Brighton’s Health Solidarity Hub have mobilised volunteer nurses and community activists to accompany marginalised women through complex pathways. Their efforts—echoing the ethos of women’s advocacy groups’ Brexit response—demonstrate resilience and solidarity when formal institutions falter.
Advocacy in Action: Women’s advocacy groups, Brexit response
From its inception, the Fawcett Society has acted as a sentinel for gender equality. Under Sam Smethers’s leadership, it launched a “Brexit Watch” project to monitor shifts affecting women, publishing quarterly briefings on the Brexit effects on gender policies. “Our reports show that without vigilant oversight, progress can slip away,” Smethers stated, underscoring the need for continuous scrutiny.
Simultaneously, the Women’s Budget Group, headed by Diane Elson, modelled the fiscal impact of benefit changes on lone mothers and low‑income families, drawing attention to the unequal burden of inflation and austerity. Their evidence‑based campaigns have pressed Ministers to retain key EU‑derived entitlements, most notably in parental leave and public‑sector pay negotiations.
At a grassroots level, Migrant Women’s Voices UK has offered legal clinics for Eastern European women unsure of their residency status, guiding them through the Settlement Scheme and challenging unlawful dismissals. Their casework has revealed patterns of post‑Brexit gender discrimination in the UK, prompting joint action alongside the Public and Commercial Services Union.
Parliamentary allies have also rallied. Shadow Equalities Minister Marsha de Cordova convened a cross‑party Women’s Rights Forum in 2023, ensuring NGOs such as the Fawcett Society and Stonewall delivered testimony on the real‑world consequences of diverging from EU norms. This gathering produced concrete recommendations for a new Gender Progress Duty, championed by Harriet Harman in the Commons.
City‑region coalitions in Manchester and Edinburgh drafted local “Gender Equality Charters,” pledging to maintain alignment with EU standards on pay transparency, maternity provision and healthcare access. Endorsed by mayors Andy Burnham and Humza Yousaf, these charters demonstrate that sub‑national leadership can counterbalance Westminster’s drift.
Through this mosaic of advocacy—from legal clinics to policy forums—the women’s advocacy groups’ Brexit response shows that rights are defended not only in grand institutions but in the determination of communities to uphold dignity and justice.
Securing Progress—Gender Equality Post-Brexit in the UK and Future Directions
The journey from EU membership to sovereign policymaking has exposed fractures in the UK’s gender‑equality architecture, but it has also energised a new chapter of civic engagement. As we reflect on Gender equality post‑Brexit in the UK, the evidence is clear: legislative safeguards require reinforcement, funding for women’s services must be ring‑fenced, and immigration policy needs a gender lens to prevent new forms of exclusion.
A standalone Gender Progress Duty would legally oblige public bodies to assess and report the impact of every new policy on gender equality, creating enforceable accountability mechanisms rather than mere aspirations. Embedding such a duty in statute would transform how government agencies measure success, ensuring that women’s rights remain central in policy development.
Equally vital is the expansion of data‑collection efforts. Only by disaggregating statistics on employment, pay and healthcare by gender, race and migration status can policymakers identify emerging disparities. Organisations like the Women’s Budget Group and the Institute for Fiscal Studies must be resourced to produce annual “State of Gender Justice” reports, ensuring that progress and setbacks—remain visible.
Future advocacy must also embrace intersectionality. Black, Asian and migrant women face compounded barriers, from language access in health clinics to bias in tribunal hearings. By centring their experiences through participatory research and community‑led commissions, the UK can craft equality measures that reflect the lived realities of all women.
Finally, renewed solidarity across borders will strengthen domestic campaigns. UK NGOs should forge partnerships with European counterparts, such as Germany’s Terre des Femmes or Ireland’s National Women’s Council, to share strategies and mobilise collective action on issues like cross‑border healthcare and anti‑discrimination law. In doing so, the UK can re‑weave the networks of support that once flowed through Brussels, ensuring that the promise of gender equality transcends political separation. Through steadfast vigilance and collaborative innovation, the spirit of resistance that has animated women’s movements for decades will secure hard‑won rights for generations to come.
Keep Independent Voices Alive!
Rock & Art – Cultural Outreach is more than a magazine; it’s a movement—a platform for intersectional culture and slow journalism, created by volunteers with passion and purpose.
But we need your help to continue sharing these untold stories. Your support keeps our indie media outlet alive and thriving.
Donate today and join us in shaping a more inclusive, thoughtful world of storytelling. Every contribution matters.”
