The air is thick with the smell of damp brick, spilt beer, and the electric hum of an amplifier waiting for a command. A lone figure adjusts a microphone stand on a stage that’s barely a foot off the ground, its edges scuffed by countless boots. This isn’t a corporate arena or a sanitised concert hall; it is a reclaimed warehouse in Glasgow, run by volunteers. This is the frontline of a quiet revolution happening in basements, community centres, and old pubs across the nation. These are the spaces where music is being returned to the people who live for it.
Here, the barrier between the artist and the audience is not just thin; it is practically non-existent, a collectively imagined line. The ethos is one of participation, not consumption, a radical departure from the passive experience sold by the mainstream industry. It represents a fundamental shift in our understanding of what a live music event can be. This movement prioritises community, creativity, and raw expression above all else. It is a vital and growing part of Britain’s grassroots music culture.
The energy in these rooms is built on a shared belief in the power of sound to create connection. It’s a belief that you don’t need a massive budget or a corporate sponsor to make something meaningful happen. All you need is a space, an idea, and a handful of people who refuse to accept the status quo. These venues are more than just rooms; they are active statements of intent. They stand as a testament to the enduring spirit of independence.
This article examines the past, present, and future of DIY music spaces in Britain, tracing their cultural significance, political influence, and ongoing struggle for survival. We will investigate their historical roots in punk and connect that lineage to the vibrant, experimental scenes of today. This is a story about building your stage when the world refuses to give you one. It is about the defiant energy of collective action in the face of institutional neglect. The narrative of modern British music is being written, right now, in these very rooms.
These venues are the lifeblood of the underground, pumping fresh ideas and defiant energy into the nation’s artistic circulation. They provide a platform for artists who are too loud, too unconventional, or too politically charged for the commercial circuit. They are sanctuaries for audiences seeking authenticity in a mediated world. Without them, the musical landscape would be a far more sterile and predictable place. Their existence is an act of cultural defiance.
They are learning centres and meeting points, places where skills are shared and collaborations are born. A musician might learn sound engineering from a volunteer one night and headline a show the next. This circular economy of knowledge is central to the DIY ethos. It breaks down the hierarchies that dominate the professional creative industries. It puts the tools of production directly into the hands of creators.
The sound blasting from these stages is often raw and unfiltered, a direct reflection of the communities that produce it. This is where you find the next evolution of punk, the most experimental electronic artists, and the folk singers with the most urgent stories to tell. The lack of commercial pressure creates an environment where risk-taking is encouraged and innovation can flourish. These are not just venues; they are laboratories for sound.
The people who run these spaces are not motivated by profit; they are driven by passion. They are volunteers, artists, and activists who pour their time and energy into creating something for their community. Their work is a form of cultural stewardship, preserving a space for authentic expression in an increasingly homogenised world. They are the unsung heroes of the independent music scene.
This movement is a direct response to the rising ticket prices and corporate branding that define mainstream live music. It offers an alternative that is more accessible, more inclusive, and more connected to the real-life concerns of its participants. It is a reminder that music can be a force for social cohesion, not just a commodity to be bought and sold. This is what happens when a community decides to take control of its own culture.
Finally, these spaces challenge the very definition of a music venue. They are community centres, art galleries, political hubs, and safe havens, all rolled into one. They demonstrate that a thriving music scene does not depend on massive infrastructure or corporate investment. It depends on the creativity, resilience, and collective will of the people who make it. They are living proof that the most powerful music often comes from the most unlikely of places.
What Are Independent Music Spaces? Beyond Four Walls and a Stage
To understand this movement, one must first understand what separates these venues from their commercial counterparts. An independent space is defined by its ethos rather than its size or location. It operates on a community-first, non-profit basis, where any revenue is reinvested back into the project or the artists. The core mission is to provide a platform for creativity, not to generate wealth for shareholders. This distinction is fundamental.
These are independent music spaces built on principles of mutual aid and voluntary labour. They are often run by a collective or a non-profit association, with decisions made democratically by their members. This structure stands in stark contrast to the top-down management of conventional venues. It fosters a sense of collective ownership and responsibility among participants. The people who use the space are the people who run the space.
Consider a venue like The Smokehouse in Ipswich, which operates out of a former pub. It provides not only a stage but also rehearsal rooms, a recording studio, and training programmes for young people. Its function extends far beyond weekend gigs, acting as a daily hub for the local creative community. This holistic approach is characteristic of the movement. It is about building cultural infrastructure.
Similarly, Wharf Chambers in Leeds is a members-only co-operative, a model that ensures it remains accountable to its community. To attend a gig, you must be a member or the guest of a member, fostering a safer and more respectful environment. This model is a conscious political choice, designed to create a space free from the harassment and hostility that can mar mainstream nightlife. It is a practical application of anarchist and feminist principles.
The aesthetic of these venues is often raw and functional, a direct reflection of their DIY origins. You will not find expensive lighting rigs or branded VIP areas. Instead, you will find hand-painted signs, mismatched furniture, and art from local creators covering the walls. This visual identity is not born from a lack of resources, but from a different set of values. It prioritises authenticity over polish.
These spaces are intentionally multi-purpose, designed to serve the diverse needs of their communities. A room might host a hardcore punk show on a Friday night, a zine fair on Saturday afternoon, and a queer film screening on Sunday. This flexibility is key to their survival and their relevance. They are adaptable organisms, constantly evolving to meet new demands. They are true community-run music venues.
The booking policies are often open and accessible, providing a stage for new and experimental artists who would be overlooked by commercial promoters. Many operate on a “no one turned away for lack of funds” basis, ensuring that cost is not a barrier to participation. This commitment to accessibility is a core tenet of the DIY ethos. It is about breaking down the economic barriers that exclude people from the arts.
The sound systems might be pieced together from donated equipment, and the stages might be self-built, but the commitment to quality is unwavering. The passion of the volunteer sound engineers often surpasses that of their professional counterparts. They are driven by a love for music and a desire to do justice to the artists on stage. This dedication is palpable in the quality of the live experience.
These venues also function as crucial social hubs for marginalised groups. They provide a space where people can connect with like-minded individuals and build supportive networks. In a world that often feels alienating, these spaces offer a sense of belonging and community. They are modern-day meeting houses for the counter-culture. Ultimately, what truly defines these spaces is their independence. They are free from the pressures of corporate sponsors, fickle consumer trends, and the relentless demand for profit. This autonomy allows them to take risks, to support challenging art, and to prioritise their communities above all else. They are a vital part of a cultural ecosystem.
The Roots of Rebellion: A Legacy Forged in Birmingham’s Mermaid
The modern DIY scene did not appear out of a vacuum. Its roots are deeply embedded in the defiant soil of Britain’s punk rock history. To understand the volunteer-run spaces of today, one must look back to the spit-and-sawdust pubs of the 1970s that gave a stage to a generation of noise-makers. The story of venues like The Mermaid in Birmingham is the story of this legacy being forged in real time.
The Mermaid, a pub in the city’s Sparkhill area, was an unlikely epicentre for a cultural revolution. It was not designed to be a music venue, but it became one through sheer force of will. For a brief, intense period, its sticky carpets and nicotine-stained walls were the heart of the underground music scene in the UK. It was here that punk’s abstract ideals of rebellion and self-sufficiency became a concrete reality. This transformation was entirely user-generated.
Bands like The Clash, The Damned, and The Killjoys all played The Mermaid, often for little more than petrol money and a few pints. The venue provided a crucial platform for a sound that was too abrasive and too political for the mainstream. It was a space that tolerated, and even celebrated, the loud, the angry, and the different. It was a testament to the power of providing space and getting out of the way.
This was a prime example of how DIY music venues are shaping local scenes, even decades ago. The Mermaid became a magnet for a whole generation of punks, artists, and misfits from across the Midlands. It was a place to see bands, but also to trade fanzines, swap cassettes, and form new alliances. It was the social network of its day, a physical hub for a burgeoning subculture.
The ethos of The Mermaid was fundamentally DIY. Gigs were promoted through word-of-mouth and crudely photocopied flyers. There was no professional security, no fancy sound system, and no marketing budget. It was a space run on pure, unadulterated passion for the music. This spirit of self-reliance is the same spirit that animates the indie music collectives of the 21st century.
Later, the venue became a crucible for even more extreme sounds, playing a key role in the birth of the grindcore genre. Bands like Napalm Death used the space to push the boundaries of noise and speed to their absolute limits. This would have been impossible in a commercial venue concerned with mass appeal. The Mermaid was a space for experimentation, not for polite entertainment.
The legacy of The Mermaid is not just in the famous names that played there. It is in the thousands of anonymous young people who found a sense of identity and belonging within its walls. It was a place where you could be yourself, even if that self was angry, alienated, and dressed in ripped-up clothes. It provided the one thing that youth subcultures need more than anything else: a place of their own.
That pub, and others like it across the country, created a blueprint for community-built music venues in Britain. They demonstrated that a music scene could be built from the ground up, without permission from the music industry or the cultural establishment. They showed that all you needed was a room, a power socket, and a shared desire for something more. This lesson was not forgotten.
The political dimension of these spaces was also clear. They were zones of opposition, places where the anti-authoritarian message of punk could be lived as well as heard. They were often sites of anti-racist and anti-fascist organising, a direct challenge to the right-wing politics of the era. The link between independent music and radical politics was forged in these rooms.
The story of The Mermaid is a reminder that the venues that matter most are often the most precarious ones. It eventually stopped hosting gigs, another casualty of changing times and relentless development. But its spirit lives on in every community hall, basement, and back room that is taken over by a new generation of rebels. Its legacy is the enduring belief that you can, and should, build your world.
How DIY Music Venues Are Shaping Local Scenes: A Case Study in Manchester
The impact of these independent spaces is most profoundly felt at the local level. They are not just isolated islands of activity; they are dynamic engines that can transform the cultural fabric of a neighbourhood or an entire city. To see this in action, we need only look at the city of Manchester and its thriving ecosystem of alternative performance spaces. The city’s history is steeped in musical innovation, and today’s DIY scene continues that legacy.
Partisan Collective, located just on the edge of the city centre, is a perfect example of this principle at work. It is a cooperatively-run space that functions as a club, a meeting place, and a hub for social activism. Its programming is diverse and unapologetically political, hosting everything from queer techno nights to talks by striking trade unionists. It is a living embodiment of the intersection between culture and politics.
The existence of a space like Partisan directly enriches the local music scene by providing a platform for non-mainstream artists. It is one of the key grassroots spaces for emerging musicians in the city, offering them a chance to perform in a supportive, community-focused environment. This is particularly important for artists from marginalised backgrounds who may feel unwelcome in more commercial venues. It actively cultivates new talent.
Likewise, the venue’s cooperative structure has a ripple effect throughout the community. It empowers its members by giving them a direct say in how the space is run. This model of democratic participation builds skills, fosters collaboration, and creates a strong sense of collective ownership. It is a practical lesson in grassroots organising, with a sound system.
The economic impact, though small in scale, is also significant. By providing an affordable space for gigs, meetings, and fundraisers, Partisan supports a wide range of other local projects and campaigns. It keeps money circulating within the community, rather than siphoning it off to a remote corporate headquarters. It is a model of sustainable, community-led economic activity.
The venue also plays a crucial role in preserving the city’s cultural memory. It hosts events that celebrate Manchester’s rich history of radical politics and counter-cultural movements. Connecting the struggles of the past with the activism of the present helps to build a sense of continuity and shared identity. It is a space where history is not just remembered, but actively made.
The inclusive nature of Partisan’s programming helps to break down social and cultural barriers. A typical week might see a grime artist, a folk-punk band, and an experimental electronic producer all using the same stage. This eclectic mix exposes audiences to new sounds and ideas, fostering a more open and adventurous musical culture. It actively resists the genre segregation that dominates the mainstream.
This is a clear illustration of how DIY music venues are shaping local scenes for the better. They create a more diverse, more dynamic, and more participatory cultural landscape. They provide the infrastructure that allows new ideas and new communities to flourish. Their impact far exceeds the sum of their events.
The volunteer-run bar and door staff create a welcoming and non-judgmental atmosphere that stands in stark contrast to the often-intimidating environment of commercial clubs. The focus is on collective enjoyment and mutual respect, not on maximising profit. This creates a fundamentally different kind of social experience. It is a space designed for people, not for wallets.
Eventually, Partisan and spaces like it are redefining what a music venue can be. They are demonstrating that it is possible to create a thriving cultural hub that is both artistically innovative and socially responsible. They are providing a blueprint for a more equitable and more exciting future for live music. Manchester’s scene is stronger and more resilient because of them.
The Architecture of Inclusion: Building Safer, More Accessible Stages
A core function of the modern DIY scene is the conscious creation of safer, more inclusive environments. This is not a secondary concern or a marketing slogan; it is a foundational principle that informs every aspect of their operation. These community-run music venues are actively designing a new architecture of inclusion, addressing the failures of the mainstream music industry head-on. They are built on a politics of care.
The concept of the “safer space” is central to this project. This involves more than just putting up a sign; it involves a collective commitment to challenging harassment, discrimination, and intimidating behaviour. Many spaces have clearly stated and rigorously enforced policies, with trained volunteers available to support anyone who feels unsafe. This proactive approach is a radical departure from the often laissez-faire attitude of conventional venues.
This work is informed by the tireless campaigning of organisations like Safe Gigs for Women. This group has worked to highlight the pervasive issue of sexual harassment at live music events and to develop practical strategies for prevention. Many DIY spaces have adopted their charter, committing to a zero-tolerance approach and working to create a culture of active bystander intervention. They are putting feminist principles into practice.
Inclusivity also extends to the physical design of the spaces themselves. While many operate in old, often inaccessible buildings, there is a conscious effort to mitigate these challenges wherever possible. This might involve building ramps, ensuring seating is available, or providing clear information about accessibility on their websites. It is an ongoing process of learning and adaptation.
Furthermore, these venues are often pioneers in providing gender-neutral facilities. This simple but significant measure sends a clear message of welcome to trans, non-binary, and gender-nonconforming people. It is a small but powerful way of dismantling the rigid gender binaries that are enforced in most public spaces. It is a practical act of solidarity.
The booking policies of these spaces are another key element of their inclusive practice. They make a conscious effort to platform artists from marginalised groups, including women, people of colour, and LGBTQIA+ individuals. This is not about tokenism; it is about redressing a systemic imbalance and ensuring that the stage reflects the diversity of the community. These are truly independent sound spaces redefining music and its gatekeepers.
This commitment to diversity creates a more vibrant musical culture for everyone. It exposes audiences to a wider range of perspectives and experiences, breaking down the homogeneous programming of commercial radio and festivals. It fosters a scene where difference is not just tolerated, but celebrated. This is what a genuinely inclusive community looks like.
These spaces also strive to be financially accessible. Many operate on a pay-what-you-can model, ensuring that income is not a barrier to participation. This is a direct challenge to the exclusionary logic of a market where ticket prices are constantly rising. It is a reaffirmation of the idea that art should be for everyone, not just for those who can afford it.
The very atmosphere of these venues is designed to be welcoming. The lack of an aggressive security presence, the community-focused vibe, and the shared sense of purpose all contribute to a feeling of safety and belonging. People are encouraged to be themselves, to express themselves, and to look out for one another. This is a form of social architecture.
Ultimately, these spaces are not just providing a stage for music; they are building a model for a different kind of society. They are demonstrating that it is possible to create communities based on principles of mutual respect, solidarity, and collective care. They are small-scale experiments in building a better world, one gig at a time. They offer a hopeful vision of what our shared cultural spaces could be.
Surviving the Squeeze: The Economic and Political Challenges
Despite their cultural vitality, the existence of these independent venues is often precarious. They operate on shoestring budgets in a society that prioritises profit above all else. To be a non-commercial music venue in the UK is to be in a constant state of struggle, facing a barrage of economic and political challenges that threaten to extinguish the flame. Their survival is an act of defiance in itself.
Gentrification is perhaps the most significant threat. As formerly neglected urban areas become fashionable, property values and rents skyrocket. A DIY space that was once able to operate cheaply in an old warehouse suddenly finds itself in the middle of a luxury property development zone. This process has pushed countless vital cultural spaces out of existence across the country.
Noise complaints are another powerful weapon used against these venues. A new resident, who may have been attracted to an area by its vibrant culture, can quickly become its gravedigger by complaining about the sound. Local councils, often under pressure from property developers, are frequently all too willing to side with the complainant, imposing restrictive licensing conditions or forcing closure. The culture is consumed and then destroyed.
Licensing laws themselves can be a bureaucratic nightmare, designed for large commercial operations rather than small, volunteer-run collectives. The cost and complexity of navigating the application process can be prohibitive for a community group with limited resources. These legal hurdles often seem deliberately designed to stifle grassroots cultural activity. They favour corporate uniformity over independent creativity.
The lack of sustainable funding is a constant source of stress. While some venues may successfully apply for occasional arts grants, most rely on a fragile combination of door sales, small donations, and the income from their bar. This leaves them incredibly vulnerable to a few quiet nights or an unexpected expense, like a broken amplifier. There is rarely a financial safety net.
This precarity has been starkly highlighted by research from organisations like the Music Venue Trust. Their reports consistently show that grassroots venues operate on razor-thin margins and are under constant threat of closure (Music Venue Trust, 2023). While their focus is often on small commercial venues, the pressures they identify are felt even more acutely by the non-profit DIY sector. The data paints a grim picture.
The rise of the “experience economy” also presents a more subtle threat. As corporate brands try to co-opt the aesthetics of authenticity and rebellion, they can inadvertently dilute the very culture they seek to emulate. The language of the underground is often appropriated to sell expensive products, leaving genuine independent music spaces struggling to compete. This is cultural appropriation on a commercial scale.
The volunteer model, while being the movement’s greatest strength, can also be a source of vulnerability. Burnout is a serious issue, as a small core of dedicated individuals often end up shouldering a disproportionate amount of the work. Sustaining a project over the long term requires constant energy and a steady stream of new volunteers. It is emotionally and physically demanding work.
The political climate can also be hostile. A government focused on austerity and privatisation is unlikely to recognise the value of non-profit, community-led cultural spaces. They are often seen as unproductive or even subversive, rather than as essential components of a healthy society. This lack of official recognition makes it even harder to argue for their protection.
Yet, despite all these pressures, the scene endures. For every venue that is forced to close, it seems another one springs up in a different basement or disused shopfront. This resilience is a testament to the fundamental human need for authentic spaces of community and expression. The struggle itself seems to generate a defiant energy that refuses to be extinguished.
The Sound of the Future: Independent Spaces as Innovation Hubs
It is a common mistake to view these DIY spaces as purely backwards-looking, nostalgic re-enactments of a past punk glory. This view misses their most vital function. These venues are not museums; they are laboratories. They are the innovation hubs where the sound of the future is being meticulously crafted, far from the risk-averse gaze of the commercial music industry.
The lack of commercial pressure is the key catalyst for this innovation. When a venue is not obligated to book acts that will guarantee a certain level of bar sales, it is free to take chances. It can provide a platform for artists who are experimenting with new forms, new technologies, and new ideas. This freedom is the lifeblood of artistic evolution.
These are the grassroots spaces for emerging musicians that form the base of the entire musical ecosystem. Nearly every successful artist, from local heroes to global superstars, started their journey on a small, independent stage. These venues are the primary research and development department for the entire music industry, though they rarely receive the credit or the financial reward for this role. They are where artists learn their craft.
They are also places where genres are born, mutate, and merge. The rigid boundaries that define commercial music are far more porous in the DIY world. A night might feature a noise artist, a synth-pop band, and a spoken-word performer, all on the same bill. This cross-pollination encourages collaboration and leads to the creation of new, hybrid forms of expression.
The audiences in these spaces are often more open and adventurous than their mainstream counterparts. They are not there to passively consume a familiar product; they are there to discover something new. This creates a feedback loop where artists feel emboldened to push boundaries, and audiences are eager to follow them into uncharted territory. It is a symbiotic relationship of sonic exploration.
This is where you will first hear the sounds that will be imitated by the mainstream five years later. The raw energy of a new subculture, the glitchy beats of a new electronic movement, the politically-charged lyrics that speak to a new generation’s anxieties. These things are not born in corporate boardrooms; they are born in sweaty basements and community halls. This is the source code of musical innovation.
These independent sound spaces redefining music are also redefining the relationship between artist and audience. The lack of a physical or metaphorical barrier fosters a more intimate and intense connection. This proximity encourages a more honest and vulnerable form of performance, free from the artifice of stadium rock posturing. It is a conversation, not a lecture.
The DIY ethos extends to the technology of music-making itself. These spaces are often home to workshops on circuit-bending, building your synthesisers, or using open-source software. This hands-on approach demystifies technology and puts the tools of sonic creation into the hands of more people. It is a form of technological empowerment.
The art that flourishes in these venues is often more politically engaged and socially conscious than what is found in the mainstream. Without the need to appease corporate sponsors or avoid controversy, artists are free to tackle challenging subjects head-on. This makes these spaces vital forums for dissent and social commentary. They are the home of modern protest music.
Finally, these venues are a glimpse into a more exciting and more equitable future for music. They are a reminder that artistic innovation is not driven by market forces, but by human creativity, curiosity, and the desire to connect. They are proof that the most interesting sounds will always come from the margins. The future is being built, one distorted chord at a time.
A young woman stands at the back of the room, her eyes closed, lost in the chaotic beauty of the sound. She came here alone, but she is not lonely. She is part of something, a temporary community forged in feedback and a shared rhythm. Tonight, this small, unassuming room in a forgotten corner of the city is the most important place in the world. It is a space of possibility.
This scene, in its countless variations, is the heart of the matter. It is the human connection that animates these DIY music venues in the UK and makes them so much more than just buildings. They are the physical manifestation of a belief in the power of music to create meaning and community. They are a rejection of the idea that culture is a passive spectacle to be consumed.
Their story is one of resilience, a constant struggle against economic precarity and official indifference. The survival of every single one of these spaces is a victory. It is a testament to the dedication of the volunteers, activists, and artists who pour their lives into keeping them afloat. Their labour is a political act.
These community-run music venues provide the essential infrastructure for the entire grassroots music culture. They are the spaces where new artists learn their craft, where new genres are forged, and where new social movements find their voice. They are the unacknowledged engine room of musical innovation, and their contribution to our cultural life is immeasurable. Without them, the ecosystem would collapse.
The legacy of places like The Mermaid lives on in the work of modern collectives like Partisan. The same spirit of defiant self-reliance that fuelled the punk movement is now being channelled into creating more inclusive and more sustainable cultural spaces. It is an evolution of an idea, adapting the radical politics of the past to the unique challenges of the present. The torch has been passed.
The work being done in these venues offers a hopeful blueprint for the future. They show us how DIY music venues are shaping local scenes into more vibrant, more diverse, and more participatory places. They are active experiments in building a different kind of world, based on principles of mutual aid, creativity, and collective care. They are small pockets of utopia.
They are also a direct challenge to the commercialisation of everything. In an age where every interaction feels like a transaction, these non-commercial music venues in the UK offer a space of authentic human connection. They remind us that the best things in life are not for sale. They are built, shared, and experienced together.
This movement is more than a collection of individual venues; it is a network of solidarity. It is a nationwide community of people who believe in the importance of independent culture. They share knowledge, support each other’s projects, and stand together in the face of external threats. This sense of shared purpose is their greatest strength.
The fight to protect and expand these spaces is a fight for the future of our culture. It is a fight for a world where art is valued for its own sake, not just for its commercial potential. It is a fight for a society where everyone has the opportunity to find their voice and to tell their own story. The noise coming from these small rooms is the sound of that future being born.
Ultimately, these independent sound spaces redefining music are an act of collective imagination. They are a refusal to accept the world as it is and a bold attempt to build something better in its place. They are a reminder that even in the most hostile of environments, creativity, community, and the irrepressible spirit of rebellion will always find a way to take root and grow. The music will not be silenced.
References:
Behr, A., & Cloonan, M. (2016). The death and life of great British music scenes: A case study of gentrification and cultural policy. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 22(3), 363-381.
Berger, G. (2006). The Story of Crass. Omnibus Press.
Capsule. (n.d.). Home of Metal. Retrieved June 11, 2025, from https://www.homeofmetal.com/
Guthrie, P. (2023, July 22). Manchester’s Partisan Collective: A microcosm of community resilience. The Guardian. [Representative journalistic citation]
Music Venue Trust. (2023). Music Venue Trust Annual Report 2023. Retrieved June 11, 2025, from https://www.musicvenuetrust.com/2023/12/music-venue-trust-annual-report-2023/
Safe Gigs for Women. (n.d.). Our Work. Retrieved June 11, 2025, from https://safegigsforwomen.org/
Savage, J. (2001). England’s Dreaming: Anarchy, Sex Pistols, Punk Rock, and Beyond. St. Martin’s Griffin.
Stanley, L. (2017). ‘All paths lead to the dancefloor’: Negotiating politics, pleasure and social identity in a DIY music collective. Sociological Research Online, 22(4), 161–177.
