When Kanye West, now known as Ye, took to social media to declare, “I HAVE DOMINION OVER MY WIFE,” the digital sphere erupted. The stark, possessive language sent shockwaves, sparking immediate outrage and a chilling sense of recognition. This wasn’t merely another celebrity rant; it was a blatant affirmation of patriarchal power, echoing through the digital echo chamber and into real-world conversations about male power and the ownership of female bodies. In a single, declarative sentence, Ye laid bare a mindset that feminist scholars and activists have long fought against: the idea that men inherently possess authority over women.
This article will dissect Ye’s disturbing statement through a feminist lens and gender perspective, unpicking the layers of patriarchy embedded within his words. We will explore how this assertion of “dominion” is not an isolated incident, but rather a symptom of a broader societal resurgence of right-wing ideologies that seek to reinstate traditional gender hierarchies. Furthermore, we will examine the troubling connections to the Trump era’s rhetoric on women, alongside the deeply disturbing currents of antisemitism and racial undertones that have become increasingly intertwined with Ye’s public persona. This is not just about one man’s words; it’s about the insidious systems of power they reflect and reinforce.
Deconstructing “Dominion”: A Feminist Critique of Patriarchal Control
The word “dominion” itself is loaded. It’s not a neutral term; it’s steeped in history, resonating with biblical undertones of humankind’s supposed rule over nature, and by extension, within patriarchal frameworks, man’s supposed rule over woman. To assert “dominion” over another human being, particularly in the context of a marital relationship, is to deny their agency and reduce them to a possession fundamentally. It speaks to a deeply ingrained patriarchy where men are not just partners, but rulers, and women are not just individuals, but subjects. This is not merely about semantics; it’s about the very architecture of power within our society.
From a feminist critique perspective, Ye’s statement is a stark illustration of male dominance in action. It embodies the core tenets of patriarchal theory, which posits that societies are structured to privilege men and maintain gender inequality. This assertion of “dominion” isn’t just archaic language; it’s a contemporary manifestation of sexism, the belief in the inherent superiority of one sex over the other. It echoes centuries of oppression where women have been systematically denied autonomy, and their bodies and lives placed under the control of men.
Consider the implications: to claim “dominion” is to claim the right to dictate, to command, to decide the course of another person’s life ultimately. In the context of marriage, which should ideally be a partnership of equals, this language is particularly insidious. It suggests that the wife’s choices, even regarding her appearance and public image (as hinted at in Ye’s broader statement), are subject to her husband’s “approval“. This isn’t about love or partnership; it’s about ownership. It reinforces the damaging societal narrative that women, even in the 21st century, are not fully autonomous beings, but rather extensions of their husbands’ identities and desires.
This kind of language has real-world consequences. When prominent figures like Ye publicly assert such views, it normalises controlling relationships and can be deeply damaging, especially for women who are experiencing abuse. It provides a warped justification for men who seek to exert undue control over their partners, reinforcing the idea that such behaviour is not only acceptable but somehow divinely ordained or naturally justified. We must unequivocally reject this dangerous rhetoric.
Feminist theory provides us with the tools to dismantle these harmful narratives, expose the insidious ways patriarchy continues to operate, and fight for a future where all individuals, regardless of gender, are afforded true agency and respect. The fight for gender equality demands that we challenge every assertion of “dominion,” in every sphere of life, from the personal to the political.
Echoes of Trump: Right-Wing Populism and the Reinforcement of Gender Hierarchies
Ye’s assertion of “dominion” does not exist in a vacuum. It reverberates within a broader cultural and political landscape increasingly shaped by right-wing populism, a movement that often seeks to reinstate traditional gender roles and reinforce existing gender hierarchies. While Ye’s pronouncements are often erratic and defy easy categorisation, this particular statement aligns disturbingly well with the patriarchal undercurrents present in much of contemporary right-wing rhetoric. We see echoes of this in the pronouncements of figures associated with Trump and similar movements, where a nostalgic vision of a supposedly simpler past often includes a return to more rigid and unequal gender dynamics.
Right-wing populism frequently thrives on anxieties about social change, often portraying feminist and LGBTQIA+ rights movements as threats to traditional values and societal order. This ideology often idealises a patriarchal family structure, with men as heads of households and women in subservient roles. While not always explicitly stated, the underlying message is clear: men are naturally entitled to positions of power and authority, and women’s autonomy should be limited to maintain social stability – as defined by this conservative worldview. Ye’s “dominion” statement taps directly into this sentiment, echoing the male authority that right-wing ideologies often champion.
Furthermore, this worldview extends beyond the subjugation of women. Right-wing populism often targets LGBTQIA+ communities as well, framing them as further challenges to this perceived “natural order.” Both women seeking gender equality and queer individuals demanding recognition and rights are often portrayed as undermining traditional values and destabilising society. This creates a climate where gender essentialism thrives – the idea that men and women have fundamentally different natures and predetermined roles – and where any deviation from these norms is viewed with suspicion or outright hostility. The concept of “dominion” can then be seen as a tool to enforce these rigid boundaries, to keep both women and LGBTQIA+ communities in their “proper” place within a hierarchical social structure.
It is crucial to recognise the danger in this seemingly disparate rhetoric. Whether it’s coded language about “family values” or explicit assertions of “dominion,” these messages contribute to a climate where gender inequality is not only tolerated but actively promoted. By normalising the idea of male authority and female subservience, right-wing populism undermines decades of progress towards gender equality and creates fertile ground for discrimination and oppression. Understanding these connections is vital to effectively challenge both the overt and subtle ways in which patriarchal power continues to manifest in our world.
The Shadow of Hate: Antisemitism, Racism, Misogyny, and the Lens of Class
To truly understand the insidious nature of Ye’s assertion of “dominion,” we must examine it not only through the lenses of feminism, anti-racism, and anti-antisemitism but also through a left-wing, class perspective. These forms of hate are not just about social prejudice; they are deeply intertwined with economic structures and class power. Ye’s misogyny, racism, and antisemitism are not simply personal failings; they reflect and reinforce systems of inequality that are fundamentally rooted in class divisions.
From a left-wing standpoint, we recognise that ideologies of hate often serve to maintain and exacerbate class inequality. Antisemitism, for instance, has historically been used to scapegoat Jewish people for economic woes, diverting anger away from the ruling class and capitalist systems. Racism has been instrumental in justifying the exploitation of working-class people of colour, both historically through slavery and colonialism, and in contemporary forms of economic injustice. And misogyny, by relegating women to unpaid domestic labour and lower-paying jobs, underpins the capitalist system that benefits from their undervalued work. Ye’s rhetoric, therefore, can be seen as not only hateful but also as serving to reinforce the very class structures that perpetuate inequality for so many.
Furthermore, class divisions within marginalised communities themselves can be exploited by these ideologies of hate. For example, racist narratives can create divisions within the working class, preventing solidarity between white workers and workers of colour by fostering racial resentment and competition for scarce resources. Similarly, misogyny can divide working-class men and women, hindering their collective struggle for better wages and working conditions. By promoting prejudice and division, these ideologies weaken the collective power of the working class and make it harder to challenge the economic dominance of the ruling class.
Moreover, in a society marked by extreme class disparity, pronouncements of “dominion” can take on an even more sinister dimension. For working-class women, particularly women of colour and LGBTQIA+ women who already face systemic economic disadvantages, the threat of patriarchal control is often compounded by economic vulnerability. The assertion of male dominance is not just a social issue; it is an economic one, impacting women’s access to resources, opportunities, and economic independence.
Therefore, a truly comprehensive critique of Ye’s statement, and the ideologies it embodies, must incorporate a left-wing, class perspective. We must recognise how misogyny, racism, and antisemitism are not just forms of social prejudice, but also tools used to maintain class power and economic inequality. Fighting these forms of hate requires not only challenging prejudice in the realm of ideas but also dismantling the class structures that underpin them. Building class solidarity across all marginalised communities is essential to creating a truly just and equitable society, one free from both hate and economic exploitation.
Impact and Resistance: Defending Equality and Challenging Patriarchal Power
The pronouncements of figures like Ye, amplified across social media, are not abstract philosophical debates; they have tangible, damaging consequences in the real world. The normalisation of misogyny, patriarchal control, antisemitism, and racism inflicts profound emotional and psychological harm, particularly on women, LGBTQIA+ individuals, and people of colour within marginalised communities. When male dominance is celebrated and “dominion” is asserted as a right, it creates a climate of fear and intimidation, undermining the safety and well-being of those targeted by these hateful ideologies. We cannot afford to dismiss these statements as mere celebrity antics; they contribute to a culture where prejudice and discrimination are emboldened and normalised.
The impact is felt on multiple levels, manifesting for individual women as increased anxiety, self-doubt, and a sense of vulnerability in a world that seems to validate male authority over their lives. For LGBTQIA+ individuals, it reinforces the constant threat of discrimination and violence, adding to the burden of navigating a society that often marginalises their identities, and for people of colour, it exacerbates the daily realities of systemic racism and the ongoing struggle for racial justice. For those at the intersections of these identities – Black women, queer people of colour, for example – the weight of these intersecting oppressions becomes even heavier.
However, despair is not an option. Throughout history, marginalised communities have demonstrated incredible resilience and have consistently fought back against oppression. Resistance, activism, and allyship are the antidotes to hate, and we must actively challenge these harmful ideologies wherever they surface, from social media platforms to political discourse to everyday conversations. This requires a multifaceted approach, beginning with actively creating platforms and spaces to elevate the voices of women, LGBTQIA+ individuals, and people of colour, ensuring their experiences and perspectives are heard and valued.
Furthermore, education is key to dismantling prejudice, and we need to actively promote feminist and anti-racist education in schools, communities, and online spaces, fostering critical thinking and empathy. Crucially, allyship is not passive sympathy; it is active participation in the struggle for justice, demanding that we build bridges of solidarity across different marginalised communities, recognise our shared struggles and work together to dismantle systems of oppression.
We also cannot allow hate speech to proliferate unchallenged, which requires holding online platforms accountable for the content they host and actively challenging prejudice in our communities and personal interactions. Finally, real change often starts at the grassroots level, and we must support and uplift the work of community organisations and activists who are directly engaged in fighting for gender equality, LGBTQIA+ rights, and racial justice.
Community Spotlight: The Fawcett Society: Fighting for Gender Equality in the UK
For over 150 years, the Fawcett Society has been at the forefront of the fight for gender equality and women’s rights in the UK. Named after Millicent Fawcett, a key figure in the suffrage movement, this grassroots organisation campaigns tirelessly to challenge misogyny and dismantle patriarchal structures in all areas of life – from the workplace to the home and public life.
Through impactful research, national campaigns, and activism, the Fawcett Society shapes the public debate, drives policy change, and inspires action towards a society where women and girls, in all their diversity, can thrive. To support their vital work, you can donate to the Fawcett Society, become a member, volunteer your time, or participate in their campaigns. Visit their website The Fawcett Society to learn more and get involved.
Ye’s declaration of “dominion” is more than just a disturbing celebrity outburst; it is a stark reminder of the persistent and insidious nature of patriarchal power in our world. It echoes dangerous right-wing ideologies that seek to reinstate gender hierarchies and normalise misogyny, racism, and antisemitism. Challenging these ideologies requires a robust feminist critique and collective action. We must stand in solidarity with marginalised communities, practice active allyship, and continue to fight for social justice until we achieve a truly equitable and just world for all. Let us amplify the voices of resistance and build a future where “dominion” is replaced by dignity, respect, and gender equality for everyone.
Keep Independent Voices Alive!
Rock & Art – Cultural Outreach is more than a magazine; it’s a movement—a platform for intersectional culture and slow journalism, created by volunteers with passion and purpose.
But we need your help to continue sharing these untold stories. Your support keeps our indie media outlet alive and thriving.
Donate today and join us in shaping a more inclusive, thoughtful world of storytelling. Every contribution matters.”
