On illness, reproductive labour, grief, and the political conditions of bodily re-inhabitation.
Content warning: This article contains mentions of sexual violence and trauma.
There are forms of bodily loss that culture acknowledges and forms that it doesn’t. The grief of bereavement is recognised; the grief of bodily illness is partially recognised; but the subtler losses — the loss of desire after years of care work, the loss of self after pregnancy, the loss of erotic life after trauma, the gradual erosion of wanting under the pressure of institutional and social demands — remain largely unspoken. Desire after loss is mapped only in the silences of women’s private lives and the occasional confessional essay.
This silence is not accidental. The losses that attend women’s reproductive and care labour are invisible in part because the labour itself is invisible — not counted in GDP, not valued in market terms, not acknowledged as work in the way that waged labour is acknowledged as work. When that labour takes a toll on desire, on the sense of self, on the felt relationship to one’s own body, there is no available language to name it — because the language available comes from systems that have already decided the labour doesn’t count.
A feminist and left politics of desire must attend to these losses — not only to the erotic lives of women freed from constraint, but to the actual conditions under which most women encounter their bodies: in illness, in exhaustion, in the aftermath of birth, in grief, in the long accumulation of care given and seldom received. To speak of desire only in its expansive and pleasurable forms is to speak for the privileged; to speak of it in full requires accounting for the conditions that make it difficult.
The body in illness: survival and its aftermath
Serious illness reorganises the body’s relationship to itself. The body that has been the site of fever, surgery, chemotherapy, chronic pain or prolonged disability is a body that has had to turn all its available attention towards the work of survival. Pleasure, desire and the erotic are not priorities under conditions of mortal threat; the organism appropriately directs its resources towards continuing.
But what happens when the crisis passes — or when the chronic condition stabilises enough that something other than survival becomes possible? That transition, from body-as-survival-project to body-as-site-of-experience, is rarely smooth, and the cultural resources available to women navigating it are limited.
Medical sociology has documented the complex identity work involved in recovering from serious illness — the renegotiation of the relationship to the body that illness imposes, the grief for the pre-illness body, the uncertainty about what the post-illness body can do and be. For women, this identity work intersects with gendered expectations in specific ways: the body that has been ill is a body that has visibly failed to perform its social function as aesthetic object, as reproductive vessel, as smooth and productive social presence. The cultural pressure to ‘bounce back’ — to recover quickly and visibly, to return the body to its socially legible form — adds burden to the already demanding work of physical recovery.
“The return to desire after loss requires political conditions: material conditions that support women in attending to their own needs, and cultural conditions that value women’s inner lives as legitimate”
Breast cancer and its treatment offer a particularly vivid example of this dynamic. The removal or alteration of breasts — a primary site of feminine identity in Western culture, invested with both maternal and erotic significance — represents a confrontation with the cultural meaning of the female body that extends well beyond the medical facts of the illness.
Research on post-mastectomy women documents the complex negotiations involved: the grief for the lost or altered body, the navigation of changed relationships to sexuality and self-image, the pressure to demonstrate resilience and gratitude that can make the acknowledgement of loss feel forbidden. The ‘survivor’ narrative, which organises breast cancer experience around triumph and inspiration, leaves little room for the slower, messier work of mourning and re-inhabitation.
Chronic illness — conditions that do not resolve but persist over years or decades — imposes its own relationship to desire. The person with fibromyalgia, multiple sclerosis, lupus, or any of the many chronic conditions that disproportionately affect women’s lives in a body that cannot be relied upon to perform consistently, that may be painful, that requires constant management and negotiation.
The erotic life of chronic illness is a topic that receives almost no sustained public attention, even though millions of women live with conditions that affect their energy, their physical sensation and their sense of themselves as desirous and desirable subjects. The silence is itself a form of violence — it renders invisible a set of experiences that are both widespread and significant, and it leaves women navigating those experiences without the support of shared language or community.
Reproductive labour and the erosion of desire
Marxist feminist theory has long argued that reproductive labour — the labour of care, childrearing, domestic maintenance and emotional support that reproduces the labour force — is a form of work that capitalism requires but refuses to recognise as such. The domestic labour debate of the 1970s, in which Selma James, Mariarosa Dalla Costa and others argued for wages for housework, brought this analysis into sharp focus: if the labour that reproduces workers is labour, then those who perform it are workers — and the conditions under which they perform it, unpaid, isolated, invisible, and organised around others’ needs rather than their own, are conditions of exploitation.
The connection between reproductive labour and desire is straightforward but rarely made explicit: the labour of care is a labour of sustained attention to others’ needs that, under conditions of inadequate social support, crowds out attention to one’s own. A woman who has spent the day managing children, coordinating domestic logistics, performing emotional labour for a partner, and doing the invisible cognitive work of running a household has not simply been busy; she has been systematically directing her attention outwards, in a pattern that, sustained over years, can produce a genuine — and not merely functional — loss of access to her own desires.
This is not simply an observation about tiredness, though exhaustion is a real factor. It is an observation about the conditions under which selfhood is cultivated and sustained. Desire requires a certain quality of attention — the ability to turn inwards, to notice what one wants, to take the movements of one’s own preference and appetite. That quality of attention requires conditions: some space, some time, some security that one’s own needs are legitimate enough to attend to. When the conditions of reproductive labour deny women those resources systematically, the loss of desire that results is not a personal failing but a structural consequence.
The postpartum period is perhaps the most acute instance of this structural erosion. The transformation of pregnancy and birth is not only physical — though it is profoundly physical — but involves a comprehensive reorganisation of identity, attention and social role. The cultural narrative of the ‘good mother’ requires total availability to the infant, an erasure of the pre-maternal self that is idealised as loving sacrifice. The reality that this erasure is often experienced as loss — of-autonomy, of desire, of the felt sense of being a person with one’s own inner life — is systematically minimised in a culture that has invested the maternal ideal with considerable ideological weight.
Research on postpartum sexuality has documented high rates of decreased sexual desire, pain with intercourse, and body image disturbance in the postpartum period, and these experiences often persist well beyond the ‘six-week check’ at which women are pronounced recovered by a medical system not designed to attend to them. The inadequacy of postpartum care — of social support, of acknowledged transition time, of resources for the genuine processing of bodily and identity change — is not simply a medical failure. It is the medical form of a broader cultural devaluation of women’s experience in the transition to motherhood.
Trauma, the body, and the politics of recovery
Sexual trauma is the site of the most acute and most politically charged form of bodily loss. The body that has been violated, that has experienced its own boundaries as inadequate protection, that has been made into an object of someone else’s violence or coercion, enters a different relationship to desire — one marked by the complex and often non-linear experience of trauma response, in which the body’s nervous system continues to respond to past threat in ways that interfere with present desire.
The neurobiology of trauma has been substantially elaborated in recent decades, largely through the work of Bessel van der Kolk, Peter Levine and other researchers who have documented how trauma is stored somatically — in the body’s patterns of tension, arousal and shutdown — rather than only in explicit memory. This somatic dimension of trauma means that recovery involves not only processing the cognitive and emotional content of traumatic experience but re-inhabiting the body: developing new patterns of bodily experience that can coexist with, and eventually supersede, the traumatic patterns.
What this analysis makes clear is that the loss of desire after sexual trauma is not, as the popular imagination sometimes suggests, a matter of ‘getting over it’ or ‘moving on’ — a matter of willpower or positive attitude. It is a matter of the body’s deep patterns, laid down in response to conditions of threat, that change slowly and through specific kinds of experience. The political implications are significant: a society serious about women’s bodily autonomy and erotic wellbeing would invest substantially in accessible, high-quality trauma care. It would take the prevalence of sexual violence seriously as a public health issue rather than treating it as an unfortunate but peripheral problem.
Sexual violence is not peripheral. Large-scale surveys and frontline services consistently show how common it is — and how unevenly it is distributed, with higher risk for women who are marginalised by racism, ableism, poverty, and other forms of structural power. This prevalence means that the loss of desire associated with trauma is a social phenomenon with structural causes — causes located in the conditions that make sexual violence common and in the systems of power (legal, medical, social) that systematically minimise its consequences and protect perpetrators at the expense of survivors.
A left feminist politics of desire must name these structural causes directly. The erotic lives of women cannot be understood in isolation from the conditions of sexual violence and its impunity; desire cannot be freely expressed in a context in which the exercise of desire is regularly met with violation. The political work of building conditions in which women can desire freely is inseparable from the work of building conditions in which women’s bodily autonomy is materially protected — through law, through cultural norms, through economic arrangements that reduce the vulnerability associated with poverty and dependence.
Grief, ageing, and the long life of the body
The relationship between ageing and desire in Western culture is organised by a set of norms so thoroughly naturalised that they appear as simple biological facts: that desire is the province of the young, that the ageing female body is categorically undesirable, that older women’s sexuality is either invisible or comic. These norms are neither natural nor universal; they are the specific product of a culture that values women for their reproductive potential and their aestheticised youth, and that renders them socially invisible once they have passed beyond the age of peak cultural utility.
Feminist gerontology has documented the specific forms of bodily alienation experienced by older women — the complex negotiations involved in inhabiting a body that the culture has decided is no longer worth regarding, and the ways this cultural dismissal intersects with women’s own internalisation of youth-beauty norms to produce distinctive forms of distress. The grief of ageing, for women, is frequently the grief of a vanishing social existence: as the body becomes less legible within the culture’s visual codes, the person inhabiting it can come to feel invisible, dismissed and irrelevant.
This invisibility is not incidental to patriarchal capitalism; it is functional. The woman who no longer meets the culture’s criteria for feminine desirability is a woman who has less leverage in the economies of attention and approval through which the culture manages women’s behaviour. She is also, potentially, a woman less amenable to management — with less to lose from the evaluating gaze, and therefore less invested in its norms. The stereotypes of the ‘eccentric old woman’, the ‘witch’, the postmenopausal figure who no longer bothers with the performance of femininity, capture something real: the release from certain forms of surveillance that accompanies the body’s ageing outside the range of cultural legibility.
Menopause — the physiological transition that marks the end of reproductive capacity — is treated in mainstream medical and popular culture primarily as a loss: of youth, of fertility, of hormonal equilibrium, of the body’s previous configuration. This framing is partial and ideological. It reflects a culture’s investment in the female body primarily as a reproductive vessel, and its corresponding failure to value the body beyond the terms of that investment.
Feminist scholars and activists in the field of menopause and women’s health have argued for a different framework — one that treats menopause as a transition rather than a decline, and that attends to the specific experiences and needs of midlife women on their own terms rather than through the lens of what has been lost.
The political conditions of bodily return
The return to desire after loss — of whatever kind — is not primarily a psychological project, though psychological support is often necessary and valuable. It is a project that requires political conditions: material conditions that support women in attending to their own needs, cultural conditions that value women’s inner lives and desires as legitimate, and social conditions that provide the relational support necessary for genuine recovery and re-inhabitation.
Specifically, this means: adequate, accessible and destigmatised healthcare for women navigating illness, birth, trauma and ageing; genuine social support for reproductive labour, including paid parental leave, subsidised childcare and recognition of care work as socially necessary labour; a culture that values women’s experience at all stages of life and all states of the body; and the material conditions — economic security, freedom from violence, access to education and resources — that make the kind of sustained self-attention desire requires actually possible.
These are not modest demands. They represent a thoroughgoing reorganisation of how care is valued and distributed, how women’s bodies are regarded by medicine and culture, and how the social supports necessary for human flourishing are organised and funded. They are demands that connect the intimate question of women’s desire to the broadest questions of social organisation — because, finally, the conditions of desire are political, and a society that genuinely valued women’s erotic and embodied lives would look significantly different from the one that exists.
What the women who navigate bodily loss and seek their way back to themselves demonstrate, against the odds, is the persistence of desire — its capacity to return, to reconstitute itself, to find new forms even after significant disruption. This persistence is not evidence of individual resilience alone; it is evidence of something like desire itself: its tendency, given the right conditions, to reassert itself. The political work is creating those conditions. Desire itself, given room, tends to know what to do.
References
Banaei, M. et al. (2021) ‘Prevalence of postpartum dyspareunia: A systematic review and meta-analysis’, International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 153(1), pp. 14–24. doi:10.1002/ijgo.13523.
Boarta, A. et al. (2025) ‘Determinants of postpartum sexual dysfunction in the first year: A systematic review’, Healthcare (Basel), 13(22), 2977. doi:10.3390/healthcare13222977.
Bury, M. (1982) ‘Chronic illness as biographical disruption’, Sociology of Health & Illness, 4(2), pp. 167–182. doi:10.1111/1467-9566.ep11339939.
Calasanti, T.M. and Slevin, K.F. (2001) Gender, Social Inequalities, and Aging. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
Charmaz, K. (1983) ‘Loss of self: A fundamental form of suffering in the chronically ill’, Sociology of Health & Illness, 5(2), pp. 168–195.
Dalla Costa, M. and James, S. (1972) The Power of Women and the Subversion of the Community. Bristol: Falling Wall Press.
Federici, S. (1975) Wages Against Housework. Bristol: Power of Women Collective / Falling Wall Press.
Greer, G. (1991) The Change: Women, Ageing and the Menopause. London: Hamish Hamilton.
Levine, P.A. (1997) Waking the Tiger: Healing Trauma. Berkeley, CA: North Atlantic Books.
Smetanina, D. et al. (2025) ‘Sexual dysfunctions in breastfeeding females: Systematic review and meta-analysis’, Journal of Clinical Medicine, 14(3), 691. doi:10.3390/jcm14030691.
UN Women (2025) ‘Facts and figures: Ending violence against women’. Available at: https://www.unwomen.org/en/articles/facts-and-figures/facts-and-figures-ending-violence-against-women (Accessed: 28 February 2026).
van der Kolk, B. (2014) The Body Keeps the Score: Brain, Mind, and Body in the Healing of Trauma. New York: Viking.
World Health Organization (2024) ‘Violence against women (fact sheet)’. Available at: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/violence-against-women (Accessed: 28 February 2026).
